KEITH JACOBS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KEITH JACOBS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
651 So. 2d 700
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Keith Jacobs appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion. We affirm with the exception of one point raised on appeal.
Jacobs was convicted, inter alia, of attempted second degree murder and was sentenced to 12 years incarceration followed by ten years probation. The crime is a second degree felony with a statutory maximum of 15 years. §§ 777.04(4)(d) and 775.082(3)(c). The 22 year sentence imposed exceeded the statutory maximum by 7 years.
We vacate the sentence imposed for attempted second degree murder and remand to the trial court for sentencing on that conviction.
AFFIRMED IN PART; SENTENCE PARTIALLY VACATED; REMANDED.
HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Jacobs, 689 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…the court allowed appellant an unspecified, unlimited time to raise again the issue of inadequate assistance of counsel in some “future proceeding.” We affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief, except for a sentencing error in Jacobs v. State, 651 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The petition here was both successive and untimely and the court erred in granting it. The order is quashed and the cause remanded for reinstatement of the judgment and sentence. ORDER QUASHED. HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., conc…
-
Berta Cantera Chaviano and Toni L. Villaverde v. Greater Miami Caterers, Inc., 254 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)…and Petitioners’ position. In their motion for clarification, Petitioners asserted that the issue regarding the prior JCC’s refusal to disqualify himself is moot. This is correct and should end the inquiry. See James Mitchell & Co. v. Gallagher, 651 So. 2d 700, 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that motion to disqualify an official is moot when the official is no longer in office). The fact that the prior JCC will no longer preside over Petitioners’ cases renders a petition to disqualify him unnecessar…