WILLIS R. BIGGERS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PINELLAS COUNTY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment for the defendant in a case where a plaintiff sought payment for architectural plans and services related to county buildings. The court's decision was based on a prior, related ruling.
Yes, the judgment for the defendant was correct, as the case was affirmed on the authority of a prior related case.
“This is an action at law brought in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County by the plaintiff in error against defendant in error to recover several amounts alleged to be due by plaintiff in error for certain plans and specifications prepared by him for a County Court House and County Jail for said county, for furnishings for said buildings, and for certain services alleged to have been rendered by him in connection with the partial construction of s-aid jail building.”
Describes the nature of the lawsuit and the plaintiff's claims.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff sued Pinellas County for amounts allegedly owed for preparing plans and specifications for a County Court House and Jail, as well as for…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Breach Of Contract (Implied) cases and more on FLexlaw
Memorandum Opinion.
— This is an action at law brought in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County by the plaintiff in error against defendant in error to recover several amounts alleged to be due by plaintiff in error for certain plans and specifications prepared by him for a County Court House and County Jail for said county, for furnishings for said buildings, and for certain services alleged to have been rendered by him in connection with the partial construction of s-aid jail building.
The issues were made up, a jury was waived and the case was heard and determined by the Circuit Judge. The judgment was for the defendant. Plaintiff thereupon took writ of error from this court.
The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of First National Bank of Lakeland v. Pinellas County, the opinion in which case was filed on April 1, 1919.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Van Valkenburg v. Rhodes, 136 Fla. 406 (Fla. 1938)…r in our effort to give due consideration to all contentions made. We are face to face with a previous decision of this Court holding squarely against the contention of counsel for plaintiff in error as expressed in Amos v. Jacksonville Realty Co., 77 Fla. 402, 81 So. 524. This Court held therein that an assessment to “Est. P. B, Hamilton” wag unauthorized and illegal. It is possible that plaintiff in error, considering the case at bar, has certain rights created or established under the tax deed offered…