EDWIN HARPER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-03-15
No. 94-1178
STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
651 So. 2d 823 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or record attachments which show that appellant is entitled to no relief on his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to secure and interview a key defense witness, Lionel Williams, who would have testified he had no dominion or control over the cocaine. We affirm in all other respects.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Moore v. Moore, 679 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …ilities. We agree with the former husband that the trial court erred in its allocation of the marital debt without setting forth reasons for the unequal distribution. See Spence v. Spence, 669 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Wasserman v. Wasserman, 651 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Kimm v. Kimm, 650 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). We reverse the final judgment and remand for a more equitable distribution or for the court to articulate appropriate reasons for the unequal distribution of the parties’ liabil…
  • Reed v. Reed (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
  • Kerrigan v. Page (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw