EMILIO E. VALENZUELA, APPELLANT,
v.
JAIMIE J. VALENZUELA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-03-01
No. 94-1815
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
652 So. 2d 850 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Irwin v. Irwin, 455 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Malt Bros. I, Ltd. v. State Farm Ins. Co., 654 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …[O]ccupational disease theory is derived from section 440.151, Florida Statutes, which provides a doctrinal foundation separate and apart from the repeated trauma and multiple exposure injury theory as delineated in Festa.” City of Orlando v. Lemay, 652 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (citing Festa v. Teleflex, 382 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)); see also Tokyo House, Inc. v. Hsin Chu, 597 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (although exposure and repeated trauma cases are governed by the same principles, the occu…
  • …We emphasize that the instant case is not a repetitive trauma case, and this Court has explained that the elements of proof for a repetitive trauma case are not identical to those required by occupational disease cases. See City of Orlando v. Lemay, 652 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw