FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, A SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER, APPELLANT,
v.
BRUCE USSERY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Power Corporation appeals an award of bad faith attorney's fees in a workers' compensation case involving a permanent total disability claim. The court reverses the bad faith finding, holding that FPC acted diligently in investigating the claim and promptly accepted disability once medical evidence indicated permanence.
FPC did not engage in bad faith. The court holds that FPC's diligent investigation, continued provision of appropriate indemnity and medical benefits, identification of 13 available positions, and prompt acceptance of the disability claim once medical evidence supported permanence demonstrates an absence of passive delay or denial without active effort to pay benefits due.
[1] Bad faith in the handling of a workers' compensation claim requires conduct amounting to fraud, malice, oppression, or willful, wanton, or reckless disregard of the claim…
[2] Passive delay or denial of benefits without an active effort by the carrier to deliver those benefits to the claimant constitutes bad faith.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“For the purposes of this paragraph, the term bad faith means conduct by the earner in the handling of a claim which amounts to fraud; malice; oppression; or willful, wanton or reckless disregard of the rights of the claimant.”
Statutory definition of bad faith under section 440.34(3)(b) that governs the award of attorney's fees.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceUssery, an FPC employee, filed a permanent total disability claim. FPC conducted an investigation through a rehabilitation provider who identified 13 …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bad Faith Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Florida Power Corporation (FPC) challenges a compensation order awarding bad faith attorney’s fees to appellee Ussery under section 440.34(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987): “For the purposes of this paragraph, the term bad faith means conduct by the earner in the handling of a claim which amounts to fraud; malice; oppression; or willful, wanton or reckless disregard of the rights of the claimant.”
As interpreted by this court, the bad faith standard encompasses “a carrier’s passive delay or denial of payment of benefits without a showing of active effort and initiative by the carrier to place the benefits due in the hands of the claimant.” Volusia Memorial Park v. White, 549 So. 2d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Our review of the record in this case convinces us that FPC did not fail to apprise itself of the status and merits of Ussery’s permanent total disability claim. Also, during FPC’s investigation of the permanent total disability claim, FPC continued to provide all appropriate indemnity and medical benefits due to Mr. Ussery. FPC, through its trained rehabilitation provider, Mr. Heitler, identified no fewer than 13 positions available for Mr. Ussery, many of which provided on-the-job training programs. In fact, Heitler eventually placed Ussery in such an on-the-job training program after Us-sery’s treating psychiatrist established an MMI date of September 10, 1992. Also, the psychiatrist, even after assigning an MMI date and increasing claimant’s permanent impairment rating, continued to be supportive of claimant’s efforts to return to work as late as February 1993. It was not until the May 4, 1993 treatment note that the psychiatrist indicated that Ussery “is certainly in no condition at the present time to get back into the work force.” FPC received this report on May 21, 1993, and on the same day administratively accepted claimant as permanently and totally disabled.
We find an absence of evidence that FPC knew or should have known that Ussery was permanently and totally disabled before this date, and accordingly REVERSE the order of bad faith attorney’s fees.
BARFIELD and KAHN, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Volusia Mem'l Park & Nationwide Ins. Co. v. White, 549 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)