LUIS GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-03-22
No. 94-1033
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.
652 So. 2d 900 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the evidentiary ruling complained of, the upward sentencing departure, Brown v. State, 611 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 621 So. 2d 1065 (Fla.1993); Barnes v. State, 597 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 605 So. 2d 1262 (Fla.1992); Hams v. State, 531 So. 2d 1349 (Fla.1988); Moreira v. State, 500 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); § 921.001(7), Fla. Stat. (1993), or the imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory terms. State v. Thomas, 487 So .2d 1043 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw