ELEANOR W. MCKINNON, BY LEE DANIELL, HER NEXT FRIEND, APPELLANT,

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• State ex rel. J. H. Sherrill & D. A. Vann v. Milam, 113 Fla. 491 (Fla. 1932)
  …ing to the same general scheme or program for Everglades drainage, and will be construed and considered in the light of each other. Milam v. Davis, 97 Fla. 916, 123 So. 668; Curry v. Lehman, 55 Fla. 847, 47 So. 78; Dade County v. Miami, 77 Fla. 786, 82 So. 354. Each of these laws became a part of the “irrepealable contract” “between the said Board and said Everglades Drainage District with the holders of any bonds and the, coupons thereof issued pursuant to the provisions hereof.” Evidently it was the leg…
• Voorhees v. The City of Miami, 145 Fla. 402 (Fla. 1940)
  …, or that the last was clearly intended to prescribe the only rule which should govern the case provided for, or that it revises the subject matter of the former. Sanders v. Howell, 73 Fla. 563, 74 So. 802; Dade County v. City of Miami, 77 Fla. 786, 82 So. 354; City of St. Petersburg v. Pinellas County Power Co., 87 Fla. 315, 100 So. 509.” The Legislature had the power in the enactment of [*414] Chapter 18689, Special Acts of 1937, to prescribe in the Act the time or occasion when the provisions thereof…
• Lewis v. Leon Cnty., 91 Fla. 118 (Fla. 1926)
  …ing and repairing streets, a part of the revenue raised by the county for public roads, did not violate the constitutional provision here in question. To the same effect, see Hillsboough County v. State, 57 Fla. 50, 48 So. 976; Dade County v. Miami, 77 Fla. 786, 82 So. [*139] 354; Stewart v. DeLand Road & Bridge District, 71 Fla. 158, 181; 71 So. 42. It was suggested by appellants upon the oral argument that Chapter 8553 of the Laws of 1921 was violative of Section 16 of Article III of the constitution. A…

  ← 1 / 2 →