RICHARD L. HARVEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probable Cause For Warrantless Search cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. T.T., 594 So. 2d 839, 840 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (a person who is trained to recognize the odor of marijuana, is familiar with it, and can recognize it, has probable cause, based upon the smell alone, to search a person or vehicle for contraband); Rogers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1148, 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (where a vehicle’s occupants smelled of marijuana, there was probable cause to conduct a warrantless search as to each of the occupants of the vehicle) (citing Dixon v. State, 343 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)); Baggett v. State, 562 So. 2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (the search incident to a lawful arrest can precede the arrest so long as the officer has knowledge of sufficient facts to constitute probable cause to arrest a defendant prior to the search).
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Hollywood v. Lombardi, 770 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 2000)…s capped at the claimant’s net recovery and that the court “should have used the net tort recovery by the claimant as the amount which must be satisfied before the carrier need recommence full payment of future benefits.” Id.; see Bussert v. Holley, 653 So. 2d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Although this Court decided Norman under a prior version of section 440.39, neither the earlier statute nor the present statute specifically addresses the issue of the cap on the lien- or’s recovery. However, “the legislat…
-
State v. Reed, 712 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…ble cause to believe a crime had been committed6 and that Reed had committed it.7 REVERSED. GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON, J.,.. concur. . State v. T.T., 594 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). . § 893.13(l)(a)l, Fla. Stat. (1997). . Harvey v. State, 653 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. T.T., 594 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); State v. Jarrett, 530 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). . State v. T.T.; State v. Jarrett. . Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984); Chambers v. S…
-
State v. Jennings, 968 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996). Regardless of the subjective intentions of the officers, the odor of burning marijuana alone provided probable cause to search appellee. Id. at 115 (citing Harvey v. State, 653 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Dixon v. State, 343 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)). The officers in this case had probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle once they smelled the marijuana. That they may have articulated a subjective intent to sea…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dixon v. State, 343 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
- Rogers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- State v. T.T., 594 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Gale Glass Baggett v. State, 562 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)