DAVID HASKELL, APPELLANT,
v.
DEANNA ROLLINS, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
DELL, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.
GLICKSTEIN, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority on the merits of the action, but disagree on the award of attorneys’ fees by the trial court. As to that, I would reverse and remand with direction to apportion appellant’s responsibility for same in accordance with the interest he received. See § 64.081, Fla.Stat. (1993); Diaz v. Security Union Title Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 649 So. 2d 232 (Fla.1994) (holding that cotenants of property each possessing a one-half interest in property are each hable for one-half of the attorneys’ fees awarded); Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 450 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Magally Diaz v. Sec. Union Title Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Faye Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Form v. Raphael Steinhardt, 441 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)