IN RE LEON ROLLE JUNIOR BEAUBRUM, PETITIONER,
v.
LEON ROLLE, RESPONDENT
IN RE LEON ROLLE JUNIOR BEAUBRUM, PETITIONER,
LEON ROLLE, RESPONDENT
654 So. 2d 561
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
Notwithstanding this court’s order of March 1, 1995, no response has been received from Leon Rolle, respondent, and we have not been advised of any payment to the court reporter, therefore, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. That the respondent, Leon Rolle, is found in contempt of this Court and fined $500.00 to be paid to the Clerk of this Court,
2. That he is in contempt of this Court for failure to pay the court reporter fee of $113.00, and,
3. That a copy of this order, and the order of March 1,1995, will be furnished to the Florida Bar for appropriate action.
BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Zina Johnson, 814 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 2002)…rocedural requirements. Based on the clear language of the statute, we hold that the state attorney’s subpoena power under section 27.04, Florida Statutes (1997), cannot override the notice requirement of section 395.3025(4)(d). See Ussery v. State, 654 So. 2d 561, 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Hunter v. State, 639 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); State v. Buchanon, 610 So. 2d 467, 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); State v. Wenger, 560 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). To hold otherwise would render the statute meaningless. Ha…
-
State v. Rutherford, 707 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…’s medical records without complying with the notice provision of subsection 395.3025(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1995), and the procedural requirements of Hunter v. State, 639 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), which this court adopted in Ussery v. State, 654 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The trial court granted Rutherford’s motion to suppress the medical records obtained by the subpoena, on the basis of State v. Wenger, 560 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).1 The court denied the state’s request for an opportunity…
-
McALEVY v. State, 947 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…earing to the patient is meaningless ... The court must [*530] act as a shield to protect the patient’s right to privacy by determining whether medical records are relevant to a pending criminal investigation. 639 So. 2d at 74. In Ussery v. State, 654 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), this court agreed with Hunter, but did not expressly state that evidence must be presented. Rather, we concluded that all requirements are met to allow the state to issue a subpoena when notice is provided and the state “carries…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence