JONATHAN SCOTT BRONSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jonathan Bronson appealed his first-degree burglary conviction, challenging two jury instructions. The court affirmed the instruction that simple battery is a lesser-included offense of burglary with battery, but reversed one of two battery convictions because a defendant cannot be convicted of two lesser-included offenses arising from a single charge.
The court held that simple battery is correctly recognized as a lesser-included offense of burglary with battery, but a defendant cannot be convicted of two lesser-included offenses arising from a single charge. Therefore, one of the two battery convictions must be reversed.
[1] Simple battery is a lesser-included offense of burglary with a battery.
[2] A defendant cannot be convicted for two lesser-included offenses under a single charge.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A defendant cannot be convicted for two lesser-included offenses under a single charge.”
Establishes the core legal principle that Bronson cannot be convicted of two batteries when only one burglary with battery charge was brought.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBronson was charged with first-degree burglary with battery, allegedly entering a dwelling with intent to commit an offense and battering one or both …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Burglary With A Battery cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Jonathan Bronson challenges two of the jury instructions the court gave at his trial on a charge of first degree burglary punishable by life. We agree with Bronson that one of the instructions was erroneous.
The state filed a two-count information, charging under count I that Bronson:
unlawfully and without invitation or license did enter or remain in that certain structure, dwelling of Deborah Bronson or Kelly Fritz, ... with intent to commit an offense therein, and during the course thereof did make a battery upon Deborah Bronson or Kelly Fritz by grabbing or striking them with his hands; the said structure at the time not open to the public; contrary to Chapter 810.02, Florida Statutes, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.
Count II charged that Bronson carried a concealed weapon. He pleaded guilty to that charge, and it is not at issue in this appeal.
Bronson first asserts error in the court’s instruction that simple battery is a lesser-included offense of burglary with a battery. This is a correct statement of the law, and we affirm on this point. Watson v. State, 646 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bradley v. State, 540 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
The court did err, however, in instructing the jury about the number of batteries for which the defendant could be convicted. In discussing the lesser-included offense of battery, the court told the jury:
In this case there are two alleged victims and if you find that the defendant is not guilty of burglary and committing battery or burglary alone, you will then next consider whether the defendant is guilty of committing a battery, a simple battery upon either Debra (sic) Bronson or Kelly Fritz or both of them.
The verdict form allowed the jury to find Bronson guilty of a battery of Deborah Bronson and guilty of a battery of Kelly Fritz. The jury in fact found him guilty of both of these crimes.
A defendant cannot be convicted for two lesser-included offenses under a single charge. Rhames v. State, 473 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 494 So. 2d 205 (Fla.1986). The information here charged only one count of burglary with a battery. The trial court, therefore, erred in instructing the jury that it could convict Bronson of two batteries and providing a verdict form that permitted two such convictions. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction for one misdemeanor battery and reverse his conviction for the other. We remand to the trial court with instructions to strike one of the battery convictions and to resentenee Bronson based on the remaining conviction.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Torna v. State, 742 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…t conclude that Torna was indeed subjected to double jeopardy by his conviction of both “burglary with an assault and/or battery” and “battery.” See e.g., Fields v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1231, 735 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Bronson v. State, 654 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). In fact, if anything, the facts of this case lend themselves more to supporting a “burglary with a battery” conviction than a “burglary with an assault” conviction. Torna consummated his assault upon his neighbor by punching her…
-
Billiot v. State, 711 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…sistance of counsel). There are numerous cases holding that simple battery is a lesser included offense of burglary with a battery because the elements of simple battery are subsumed in the first degree burglary charge. See, e.g., Bronson v. State, 654 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Watson v. State, 646 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bradley v. State, 540 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Spradley v. State, 537 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Although the elements of simple battery are subsumed in first degre…
-
Darrin L. Bledsoe v. State, 764 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…On rehearing, Mr. Bledsoe argues that our decision conflicts with Bronson v. State, 654 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), in which we stated, “A defendant cannot be convicted for two lesser-included offenses under a single charge.” As a result, Mr. Bledsoe maintains it would be error for the trial court to enter judgments on the permissive lesser-in…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bradley v. State, 540 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Watson v. State, 646 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. White, 473 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- State v. Rhames, 494 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1986)