HAYDEE CONCEPCION, APPELLANT,
v.
YOLANDA CONCEPCION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-05-31
No. 94-2348
Before NESBITT, GERSTEN, and GODERICH, JJ.
655 So. 2d 218 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Safeway Ins. Co. v. Godoy, 584 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Raheb v. Di Battisto, 483 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Joal Wiederhold v. Wiederhold, 696 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …PER CURIAM. Following our decision in Wiederhold v. Wiederhold, 655 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), the trial court made an award of attorney’s fees and costs. On remand, the trial court did not award prejudgment interest on its ultimate award of attorney’s fees for the wife as required by Quality Engineered In [*924] stallati…
  • Migliore v. Migliore, 792 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …eys fees awards. They are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and no abuse of discretion has been shown. Bowles v. Bowles, 384 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wiederhold v. Wiederhold, 655 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Both parties have appealed the child support award. The trial court chose not to apply the child support guidelines contained within section 61.30, Florida Statutes. This constitutes error. On remand, the trial court is directe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw