WILLIAM E. CONE, APPELLANT,
v.
PATRICIA ANN CONE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Court reversed attorney's fees award because trial judge applied hourly rate without evidentiary support, requiring remand for new hearing under lodestar methodology.
Attorney's fees awarded under a marital settlement agreement must be determined using the lodestar methodology with an hourly rate supported by evidence and explanation.
[1] Under the lodestar methodology for determining attorney's fees, the trial court must support its selection of hourly rate with evidence and explanation.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant challenged the amount of attorney's fees awarded pursuant to a marital property settlement agreement that provided for fees, costs, and expe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Patient'S Compensation Fund V. Rowe Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal the appellant challenges the amount of attorney’s fees awarded as inadequate. The fees were awarded pursuant to a marital property settlement agreement which provides for fees, costs and expenses incurred for its enforcement.
This case is governed by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145, 1151 (Fla.1985), modified, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828 (Fla.1990), wherein our supreme court set forth the applicable lodestar methodology for the determination of attorney’s fees. Under this methodology, the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation is multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate for the services of the prevailing party’s attorney, which produces a “lodestar”. In the instant case, the trial judge used an hourly rate without evidentiary support or explanation. See Allison v. Allison, 605 So. 2d 130, 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), rev. denied, 618 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993). We note that the original trial judge is no longer on the bench and we therefore are unable to provide the trial court with an opportunity to reevaluate the evidence or to explain its hourly rate finding. We therefore reverse and remand for a redetermination of attorney’s fees with instructions to conduct a new evidentiary hearing.
On remand, the court is also directed to determine and award costs as the agreement clearly provides for costs and expenses for its enforcement.
REVERSED and REMANDED for treatment consistent with this opinion.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985)
- Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1990)
- Allison v. Allison, 605 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)