ELIJAH HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-07-03
No. 94-4159
JOANOS, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
656 So. 2d 625 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum, including subsequent community control, is illegal and must be corrected.


Headnotes

[1] A motion to correct an illegal sentence under Rule 3.800(a) may be raised by an inmate challenging a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum for the offense.

[2] A sentence for aggravated battery that exceeds the statutory maximum of 15 years, absent habitualization, is illegal.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

An inmate sought post-conviction relief, claiming his sentence for aggravated battery exceeded the statutory maximum. The judgment and sentence were m…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate of the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without discussion as to all grounds raised, except one.

One of the grounds raised by appellant can be read as asserting that his sentence is illegal because it exceeds the statutory maximum for the offense of which he was convicted. We treat this as a motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

In his motion, appellant asserted that, pursuant to a guilty plea, he was adjudicated guilty of the offense of aggravated battery and sentenced to 15 years in prison, with a 3-year mandatory minimum, to be followed by 253 days on community control. We are unable to determine whether this assertion is accurate because the judgment and sentence do not appear in the record. However, the sentencing guidelines scoresheet, which is a part of the record, appears to support the assertion. The trial court did not address it.

The maximum sentence permitted for the second-degree felony of aggravated battery is (absent habitualization) 15 years. §§ 784.045(2), 775.082(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993). Accordingly, if, in fact, appellant was sentenced to 15 years in prison to be followed by 253 days on community control (and he was not habitualized), such a sentence would be illegal. See, e.g., State v. Holmes, 360 So. 2d 380 (Fla.1978); Gilyard v. State, 636 So. 2d 134 (Fla.2d DCA 1994), approved, 653 So. 2d 1024 (Fla.1995). On remand, the trial court is directed to examine the judgment and sentence. If the sentence provides for 15 years in prison to be followed by 253 days on community control, the trial court shall enter an amended judgment and sentence which deletes the 253 days of community control. Appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

JOANOS, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw