TOMMY WAYNE BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credit For Time Served cases and more on FLexlaw
MICKLE, Judge.
Tommy Wayne Bailey appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, which challenged his sentences imposed following revocation of probation. The record before us does not contain documentation indicating the exact dates of service of incarceration in jail, prison and on probation, with regard to the two offenses for which Bailey was originally convicted. As such, we are unable to ascertain how the trial court arrived at the figure of one day awarded as credit for time served upon resentencing following violation of probation. As it appears that Bailey’s allegations may have some merit, we reverse the sentences and remand to the trial court for further consideration of the motion, with directions to attach to its subsequent order any documents which conclusively demonstrate that it properly calculated credit for time served in jail, prison, and on probation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baker v. State, 676 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…l support for either contention in this record. Since it is impossible to determine from the record how much time Baker actually served on his original sentences, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings on this point. See Bailey v. State, 656 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). However, we note that Baker cannot add the amount of time he has already served to the new sentences and then claim that the sentence is illegal if that amount exceeds the statutory maximum. See Jamail v. State, 637 So. 2d 362 (…