KEITH DAVID TULLIS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• J.M. v. State, 677 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …a court is obliged to reach a construction which harmonizes, and gives effect to, all of its parts if there is any reasonable basis to do so. In the Interest of T.M., 641 So. 2d 410, 412 (Fla.1994); Romero v. Shadywood Villas Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1193, 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Only if there is no alternative should one part of a statute be deemed to nullify another part of the same statute. In the present ease a construction of the statute is available which gives effect to all of its respective…
• Emil P. Verdi, Jr. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 684 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …n re McCol-lam, 612 So. 2d 572, 574 (Fla.1993) (“[H]ad the legislature intended to limit the exemption to particular annuity contracts, it would have included such restrictive language _”); see also Romero v. Shadywood Villas Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1193, 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“Had the legislature intended to exempt homeowners’ associations from ... Section 617.1605, it could easily have stated so_”); Skipper v. Skipper, 654 So. 2d 1181,1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“If the legislature had intended su…
• Nero v. Cont'l Country Club R.O., Inc., 979 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …e liable for ratifying the recall. Therefore, Appellant’s claim that the Association violated section 617.0808(3) sets forth a cause of action, and the trial court erred in dismissing the count. See Romero v. Shadywood Villas Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1193, 1194, 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (reversed the trial courts dismissal for failure to state a cause of action because the homeowners association was required to comply with both sections 617.1605 and 617.303(4)(i)). Counts II, TV and VI In counts II,…

Authorities Cited

• R.M. Orosz v. Singletary, 655 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1995)