ALBERTO CLERICO III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Authority For Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Alberto Clerieo III appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after a jury found him guilty of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22, Florida Statutes (1993). Clerieo’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record, we see no error in regard to the conviction and therefore affirm the conviction. The court erred, however, in imposing $693 in costs without citing statutory authority for those costs. See Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to strike these costs. Upon remand, the state may seek to reimpose this item of costs in accordance with the law. See Reyes.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Perkins v. State, 842 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…aring that appellant had not reported during the months of May through November, he did not file an amended affidavit alleging such a violation. Nor did the State move to orally amend the affidavit during the revocation hearing. See Rosser v. State, 658 So. 2d 175, 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (noting that it is settled that the State may substantively amend its eharg- [*278] ing document during trial over the defendant’s objection unless there is a showing of prejudice to the substantial rights of the defendant).…
-
Wallace v. State, 689 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…additional charges are filed, even at the beginning of trial, after a defendant’s refusal to plead guilty to the initially charged crimes. State v. Phillips, 642 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), rev denied, 561 So. 2d 1195 (Fla.1995); Rosser v. State, 658 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Huffman v. State, 636 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The record indicates that there was no prejudice to the defendant when the state amended the information, because defendant was out on bail and the trial was continued for twe…
-
State v. Garcia, 692 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…rmation during trial, even over the defendant’s objection, unless there is a showing of prejudice to the substantive rights of the defendant. State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla.1989); Lackos v. State, 339 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1976); Rosser v. State, 658 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (State could amend affidavit to reflect correct date that defendant was placed on probationary status); Young v. State, 632 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). By agreement, time had been tolled on Friday until the following Monday. T…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Abel Oliveros Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)