CHARLES D. VANDENBURGH, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constitutional Right To Testify cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Charles D. Vandenburgh, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Although he has raised several grounds, only one merits discussion. Vandenburgh claims that his counsel was ineffective for depriving him of his constitutional right to testify. We are required to construe appellant’s allegations implicating his constitutional right to testify most favorably to him. Williams v. State, 642 So. 2d 67, 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded with directions that, as required by Rule 3.850, the trial court either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that Vandenburgh is entitled to no relief with respect to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mims v. State, 656 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Wilson v. State, 647 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Gill v. State, 632 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In all other respects, the trial court’s order is affirmed.
REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ERVIN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Universal Emp. Agency, 664 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…tract,” Sweet Dreams Unlimited v. Dial-A-Mattress Int’l, Ltd., 1 F. 3d 639, 642 (7th Cir.1993), and was both “directly related to, and ... would not have occurred but for” the relationship it established. Chase Manhattan Inv. Sens., Inc. v. Miranda, 658 So. 2d 181, 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Since all this is true, in turn, this action — even though it sounds entirely in tort and neither claims a breach of the con [*1109] tract nor involves its performance or interpretation — must be deemed to be one “arising ou…
-
Frank v. Purrelli, 698 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…ntionally, is “complete nonsense.” Lincoln Nat’l Health & Cos. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 782 F.Supp. 110, 112-13 (M.D.Ga.1992). Florida courts have recognized invasion of privacy to be an intentional tort. See Chase Manhattan Inv. Servs., Inc. v. Miranda, 658 So. 2d 181, 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The tort of invasion of privacy was first recognized in Florida in Cason v. Baskin, 155 Fla. 198, 20 So. 2d 243 (1944), and was subsequently found to include intrusion upon seclusion. See Agency for Health Care Admin, v. Ass…
-
Boone v. Etkin, 771 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…itrated under the rules, ... of the organization with which I register.” None of the cases cited by appellee are persuasive as all involved broadly-worded arbitration provisions. For example, in Chase Manhattan Investment Services, Inc. v. Miranda, 658 So. 2d 181, 182, (Fla. 3rd. DCA 1995), and Nazon v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., 832 F.Supp. 1540 (S.D.Fla.1993), the arbitration clause was the same as in the Backus & Stratton case2. Appellee contends that since Boone’s factual allegations arise from and con…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wilson v. State, 647 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Gill v. State, 632 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Williams v. State, 642 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Mims v. State, 656 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)