AMERICAN SAVINGS OF FLORIDA, F.S.B., APPELLANT,
v.
ANDERSON, MOSS, PARKS, MEYERS & SHEROUSE, AND HICKS, ANDERSON & BLUM, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scope Of Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm: 1) the Final Order Determining Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees and Awarding Same and 2) the Amended Final Judgment. It was within the trial court’s jurisdiction to determine an issue of state law, Zaklama v. Mount Sinai Medical Ctr., 906 F. 2d 650 (11th Cir.1990), and to enter a judgment in favor of the law firms Anderson, Moss, Parks, Meyers & Sherouse, and Hicks, Anderson & Blum on their charging hens to recover attorneys’ fees from American Savings and Loan Association. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Crossland Sav., FSB, 177 A.D.2d 78, 581 N.Y.S.2d 744 (1992). As the trial court correctly recognized, the resolution of issues regarding the Office of Thrift Supervision’s scope of authority to enter the cease and desist orders falls within the purview of the Federal court, rather than the Florida court. Id.; 12 U.S.C.A. § 1818(i) (West 1989 & Supp.1995). American’s remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tarver v. State, 661 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Reversed and remanded. Scott v. State, 658 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). BOOTH, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
-
Mitchell v. State, 699 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…(Fla. 1st DCA 1993). On remand, pursuant rule 3.850(f), the trial court must consider any claims which were raised in the prior motion, unless such were previously denied on the merits. See Zeigler v. State, 632 So. 2d 48 (Fla.1993); Scott v. State, 658 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
-
Gino L. Browning v. State, 687 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…is applied only when the grounds raised were previously adjudicated on their merits, and not where the previous motion was summarily denied or dismissed as legally insufficient. Ranaldson v. State, 672 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Scott v. State, 658 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The lower court herein did not attach anything to its order denying relief. It is thus not apparent from the record whether appellant’s second motion raised the same claims as before, or whether the prior motion was denied on th…
Authorities Cited
- Esmat Zaklama, M.D. v. Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., Gardana & De La Puente, P.A., 906 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1990)