ROBERT MATOS AND TERESA MATOS, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEMS, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Rowles v. State, 682 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …The wording of this condition may subject Rowles to unintentional violation should he subsequently be [*1185] inadvertently placed in a work or social situation where young girls are present, without their parents or guardians. See Graham v. State, 658 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Lambert v. State, 635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We remand this cause to the trial court to revisit and refashion this condition, in order to minimize any inadvertent violation. Perhaps a condition that prohibits intentional…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bower v. State, 675 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …gment should note that the appellant was convicted by a jury, not that he pleaded nolo contendere. As to the sentence, it was error to impose the vague condition of probation that he have no contact with anyone under age eighteen. Graham v. State, 658 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Lambert v. State, 635 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Conviction AFFIRMED, case REMANDED for correction of judgment and deletion of special condition of probation. PETERSON, C.J., and ANTOON, J., concur.…
• Manon v. State, 740 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …make defendant subject “to unintentional violation should he subsequently be inadvertently placed in a work or social situation where young girls are present, without their parents or guardians”; remanded to rephrase the condition); Graham v. State, 658 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)(condition of no association or contact with child under 17 imper-missibly broad due to possibility that defendant could be held in violation “should he be thrust into a situation at his job or in an unplanned social situation, wh…

Authorities Cited

• Miller v. Miller, 112 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 1959)
• Susco CAR Rental Sys. OF Fla. v. Leonard, 112 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 1959)