DIANE ELAINE WHITE, APPELLANT,
v.
ELMER EARL WHITE, JR., APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Evidentiary Support cases and more on FLexlaw
WOLF, JAMES R., Associate Judge.
Appellant, former wife, challenges an order entered upon both parties’ requests for modification of alimony and child support. Appellant alleges that the trial court erred when it found her alimony would be “treated as rehabilitative in nature.” We find the trial court did in fact err since there was no request in the pleadings to convert the alimony from permanent to rehabilitative, the issue was not tried, and there was no evidence to support such a change.
Appellee, former husband, raises a number of issues on cross appeal, none of which demonstrates error requiring reversal. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions that the alimony award to the former wife be treated as permanent in nature. In all other respects, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Garone v. Parks, 668 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…his court, and obtained a stay, but apparently at that point the wife and children were already in California. After the briefs were filed, the wife’s counsel confessed error and we reversed for the trial court to conduct a hearing. Garone v. Parks, 658 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). At the September 1995 evidentiary hearing, a different trial judge found himself confronted with the fact that the wife and children were somewhat settled in California. After hearing the evidence and discussing the factors to…