C.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a trial court may not increase a legal sentence once imposed, even if the state argues it is illegal.
[1] A trial court may not increase a legal sentence previously imposed.
[2] When adjudication is withheld in a juvenile case, a court has the authority to impose restitution as part of a community-based sanction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA juvenile was ordered to complete a program and pay restitution with adjudication withheld. The state moved to redetermine the sentence, arguing rest…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Juvenile Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
QUINCE, Judge.
C.M. challenges the trial court’s order increasing her original sentence from a juvenile service program to community control. We reverse because the court may not increase a legal sentence.
C.M. appeared before the court on two juvenile petitions charging her with battery, burglary, grand theft and grand theft auto. The court withheld adjudication and ordered her to enter and successfully complete the Juvenile Alternative Services Program (JASP) and to pay reasonable restitution, among other things.
Several days after this disposition, the state filed a motion for redetermination of sentence. The state argued the sentence was illegal because restitution can only be ordered when the child is either committed to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services or is placed on community control. The trial court agreed and increased the sentence to include community control for an indefinite period and until restitution *s Pa^-
The state’s argument before the trial court and this court is premised on an erroneous interpretation of G.J.V. v. State, 637 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). This court in G.J.V. held restitution can only be imposed when an adjudicated child is committed or placed on community control. § 39.054, Fla. Stat. (1993). We did not address in G.J.V. the appropriateness of restitution when adjudication is withheld. In that circumstance, a court’s actions are governed by section 39.052(3), Florida Statutes (1993). This statutory provision gives the trial court the authority to impose restitution as a part of a community-based sanction when adjudication has been withheld. Thus, the original disposition made by the court, completion of the community-based JASP program and restitution, was proper. Since the original sentence imposed was legal, the trial court did not have authority to increase that legal sentence. Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Hinton v. State, 446 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). We reverse the order imposing community control with instructions to reinstate the original sentence.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.E. v. State, 676 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…committed children.” § 39.01(59), Fla.Stat. (1995). An increase in the level of restrictiveness therefore does not necessarily indicate an increase in the sanction or the period of commitment, but refers to the level of security. Cf. C.M. v. State, 658 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (trial court had no authority to impose additional sanctions once lawful sentence imposed on juvenile; improper to increase original sentence from juvenile service program to community control). Moreover, Chapter 39 of the Flori…
Authorities Cited
- Flazell Troupe v. The Honorable Ellen Morphonios Rowe & the Honorable Paul Baker, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 1973)
- Hinton v. State, 446 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- G.J.V. v. State, 637 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)