OWEN DELANO DENSON, JR., III, PETITIONER,
v.
THE HONORABLE EDWARD RODGERS, CIRCUIT JUDGE OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-08-16
No. 95-1846
STONE, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
658 So. 2d 1224 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court erred in rejecting a pleading solely based on division assignment, and should have assigned it to the appropriate division.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought a declaratory judgment challenging administrative action and drug testing procedures that reduced his gain time. The trial court rej…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant this petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court erred in rejecting, outright, Petitioner’s pending pleading and request for a determination of his indigency status on the grounds that the case was assigned to the wrong division of the court, criminal rather than civil, leaving Petitioner with a filed claim for extraordinary relief without administrative assignment. Appellant seeks a declaratory judgment challenging certain administrative action and drug testing procedures of the Department of Corrections, which he contends invalidly resulted in reducing his gain time and extending his release date status. He also claims that if he were to prevail, he would be entitled to consideration for release.

The record reflects that additional efforts by Petitioner to have the case administratively reassigned proved fruitless in the face of the court’s order, leaving him remediless absent this petition. At a minimum, his pleading should have been assigned to another division by the clerk or chief judge, as Petitioner requested, if not by the division judge.

We do not address whether venue should be transferred, as directed in Revell v. Paschal, 564 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), as such relief has not, as yet, been requested in the trial court by the state. Nor do we address whether the trial court could construe Petitioner’s pleading as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, asserting that Petitioner is wrongfully detained.

We withhold issuance of the writ in anticipation that the trial court will voluntarily comply with this opinion by assigning the petition to a division and by ruling on pending matters within a reasonable time. This opinion is to be implemented by the chief judge of the circuit.

STONE, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. Cir. Court of the Fifteenth Jud. Cir., 690 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …eration, which will likely be fully served before his appeal from his contempt conviction is decided, a “reasonable time” for ruling on his motion for bond would require expedited handling by the circuit court appellate panel. See Denson v. Rodgers, 658 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). As the court did in Denson, we withhold issuance of the writ in anticipation that the trial court will voluntarily comply with this opinion. This opinion is to be implemented by the chief judge of the circuit. WARNER, STEVENSO…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw