FLORA ABBOTT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, J. R. ABBOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
FLORA ABBOTT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, J. R. ABBOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
78 Fla. 577
Florida Supreme Court (1919)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— This cause having been duly considered by the court on its merits, and the court being advised of its judgment in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that the order granting a new trial herein be and is hereby affirmed on authority of Cheyney v. Roberts, 77 Fla. 324, 81 South. 475.
Affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 93 Fla. 30 (Fla. 1927)…evidence, then it is the imperative duty of this Court to set it aside and direct another trial. Sanderson v. Hogan, 7 Fla. 318; Schultz v. Pacific Ins. Co. 14 Fla. 73; F. E. C. Ry. Co. v. Hayes, 66 Fla. 589, 64 South. Rep. 274; Chambers v. Ammons, 78 Fla. 577; 83 South. Rep. 721; Wilson v. Jernigan, 57 Fla. 277; 49 South. Rep. 45. As was said by this Court, speaking through Mr. Justice Wescott, in Schultz v. Pacific Ins. Co. supra. In exercising its power and duty to set aside a verdict and grant a new…
-
Howell v. Blackburn, 100 Fla. 114 (Fla. 1930)…manifestly against the evidence. Fla. East Coast R. Co. v. Thompson, 93 Fla. 30, 111 So. R. 525; Fla; Tr. & Banking Co. v. Consolidated Title Co., 86 Fla. 317, 98 So. R. 915; Tampa Elec. Co. v. Barber, 81 Fla. 405, 88 So. R. 302; Chambers v. Armour, 78 Fla. 577, 83 So. R. 721; Wilson v. Jernigan, 57 Fla. 277, 49 So. R. 44; Sanderson v. Hagan, 7 Fla. 318; Meinhard v. Lelienthal, 17 Fla. 501. In the case at bar, the denial of the motion made by plaintiff in error for a new trial is assigned as error. This m…
Authorities Cited
- Cheney v. Roberts, 77 Fla. 324 (Fla. 1919)