DEBRA RUNDGREN, PETITIONER,
v.
DAVID GREENWELL, RESPONDENT
DEBRA RUNDGREN, PETITIONER,
DAVID GREENWELL, RESPONDENT
659 So. 2d 289
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
By this common law certiorari we review the trial court’s order compelling a party’s medical expert to respond to certain discovery. The order under review was entered prior to our recent en banc opinion in Syken v. Elkins, 644 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Based upon the authority of Syken we quash the order under review and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Syken.
Order under review quashed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lugo v. State, 2 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2008)…times in the chest. Lugo and the State disagree with regard to the applicable standard by which we should evaluate whether Lugo is entitled to a new trial. Lugo contends that the three-part test articulated by this Court in De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 289 (Fla.1995), applies. Conversely, the State contends that the claim of juror nondisclosure is proeedurally barred, and that to the extent Lugo alleges ineffectiveness of trial counsel, he has failed to demonstrate that a biased juror actually served.…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lawrence, 65 So. 3d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…(ISO) claims history reports on the three jurors and a supporting affidavit by the State Farm employee who conducted the research satisfied the requirements for obtaining a new trial set forth by the Florida Supreme Court in De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 289 (Fla.1995). Alternatively, it argued that the ISO reports contained sufficient information to require interviews with the three jurors. We do not agree that the ISO reports, standing alone, are sufficient to entitle State Farm to a new trial. Howeve…
-
Davis v. Ulysses Cohen and Cebrena Poitier, 816 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…xistence of the personal injury lawsuit, his failure to reveal the fact that he hired the Gary firm to represent him, and his additional failure to acknowledge that he knew the attorney for Steven Davis require reversal.7 In De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 289, 241 (Fla.1995), the Florida Supreme Court stated that: In determining whether a juror’s nondisclosure of information during voir dire warrants a new trial, courts have generally utilized a three-part test. First, the complaining party must establi…
Authorities Cited
- Syken v. Elkins, 644 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)