RANDALL TOWNSEND, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES E. LANE, JR., D/B/A SABAL MARKETING, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1995-09-01
No. 94-1913
PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
659 So. 2d 720 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (To entitle a movant to an evidentiary hearing, a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify the fraud and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside); Shienvold v. Habie, 627 So. 2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“Because appellant did not specifically plead the two grounds that would have formed a basis for relief — fraud and coercion — the trial court correctly dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action.”), rev. denied, 640 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Robinson v. Weiland, 936 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …94-95 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); St. Surin v. St. Surin, 684 So. 2d 243, 244 (Fla. 2d DCA [*782] 1996); Estate of Willis v. Gaffney, 677 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Dynasty Exp. Corp. v. Weiss, 675 So. 2d 235, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Townsend v. Lane, 659 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Welden, 483 So. 2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“[W]here the moving party’s allegations raise a colorable entitlement to rule 1.540(b)(3) relief, a formal evidentiary hearing on the motion, as well as…
  • Dempsey v. LAW Firm OF Cauthen & Odham, P.A., 806 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Townsend v. Lane, 659 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), cause dismissed, 667 So. 2d 776 (Fla.1996). COBB, HARRIS and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw