MAYO LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN B. TURNER, APPELLEE
MAYO LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
JOHN B. TURNER, APPELLEE
78 Fla. 653
Florida Supreme Court (1920)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said, decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gray v. Standard Dredging Co., 111 Fla. 149 (Fla. 1933)…ntire omission of the necessary party, and dealt with accordingly in the court’s decree. [*153] A material defect of parties may be noticed at any time, upon motion by counsel, or by the Court of its own motion. Swann & Holtsinger Co. v. Richardson, 78 Fla. 653, 83 Sou. Rep. 707. The practice just stated was followed in this case, and having been so followed, the decree dismissing the bill was of necessity affirmed. The extraordinary petition for a rehearing is denied. Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis,…
-
Platt v. The City of Punta Gorda, 98 Fla. 1242 (Fla. 1930)…ot appeared herein. The purchaser at a master’s sale of real estate, to whom a deed has been executed and which sale has been confirmed, is a necessary party to an appeal taken after confirmation in such proceeding. Swann & Holsinger v. Richardson, 78 Fla. 653, 83 So. R. 707; Gifford v. Plummer, 73 Fla. 1065, 75 So. R. 536; Macfarlane v. Macfarlane, 50 Fla. 570, 39 So. R. 995. The omission of necessary parties to an appeal may be noticed by the court of its own motion. Swan & Holtsinger v. Richardson, su…