MARK F. SLONE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1995-08-23
No. 95-01650
FRANK, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
659 So. 2d 1208 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court held that the trial court erred in summarily denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence without attaching relevant record portions to refute the defendant's claims.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant sought jail credit for time served prior to sentencing. The trial court denied the motion based solely on the judgment and sentence form…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Mark F. Slone appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Slone claims he should have received 258 days credit for the time he spent in jail prior to sentencing in case number 90-01203-CFA. The trial court’s denial of the motion was based solely on the Judgment and Sentence. We are unable, however, to confirm that the amount of jail credit reflected on that form is correct because the trial court failed to attach to its order relevant portions of the record, if any, refuting Slone’s assertions.

Accordingly, we must reverse the trial court’s order. On remand, if the trial court again denies relief, it must attach portions of the record supporting the rejection of Slone’s contentions. See Summerall v. State, 637 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). If such record does not exist, an evidentiary hearing must be conducted.

Reversed and remanded.

FRANK, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cohen v. Zacharia Drucker, 677 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …of the Florida courts. As Drucker’s affidavit reflects he is a citizen of Israel, where service was attempted, the complaint must state more than “Venue is proper in Broward County, Florida.” Intercarga Internacional De Carga, S.A. v. Harper Group, 659 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Finally, we deem the trial court’s grant of the motion to vacate as constituting an implicit finding that defendants moved with due diligence to vacate the defaults. Under the facts of this case, we will not revisit this findin…
  • Vanderblomen v. State, 709 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw