WILLIAM BERNARD EVANS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2010)
  …r 5, 2007, the district court issued an initial opinion that quashed the circuit court’s decision based solely on the authority of Griffin v. Stonewall Insurance Co., 346 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and Goldman v. State Farm General Insurance Co., 660 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In Griffin, the Third District considered the 1975 version of the PIP statute, which did not include the “unreasonable refusal ” provision, and held that an insured’s failure to comply with the condition precedent of attendance…
• Haiman v. Fed. Ins. Co., 798 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …nd issue, there is a disputed issue of fact as to whether certain documents requested by appellee were in fact produced. Appellant’s affidavit states that they were. Moreover, while appellee cites to Goldman v. State Farm Fire General Insurance Co., 660 So. 2d 300, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), for the proposition that compliance with the insured’s duties after a loss is a condition precedent to suit, this case is distinguishable. In Goldman, pursuant to the policy, the insured was required to submit to an examina…
• Starling v. Allstate Floridian Ins. Co., 956 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …ing was not really pleading waiver, but substantial compliance with the policy. The trial court, relying on Ferrer v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., 10 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1326 (S.D.Fla.1998), and Goldman v. State Farm Fire General Insurance Co., 660 So. 2d 300, 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), granted summary judgment based upon the insured’s failure to comply with a condition precedent that she provide a sworn proof-of-loss. The trial court wrote: 4. Paragraph 12 of the policy conditions states the following: “…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1988)