MICHAEL O'KANE, APPELLANT,
v.
MARLYN O'KANE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-09-20
No. 94-2865
Before HUBBART, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
660 So. 2d 421 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mize v. Mize, 621 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1993); Tremblay v. Tremblay, 638 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Stockburger v. Stockburger, 633 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Baez v. Baez, 627 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So. 2d 975 (Fla.1994); Tamari v. Turko-Tamari, 599 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lenders v. Durham, 564 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Hill v. Hill, 548 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 560 So. 2d 233 (Fla.1990); Sherman v. Sherman, 558 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Landa v. Landa, 539 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (11 total)

View all 11 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw