EARL L. CRAMER, APPELLANT,
v.
BRODELL PLUMBING COMPANY AND FEISCO, APPELLEES
EARL L. CRAMER, APPELLANT,
BRODELL PLUMBING COMPANY AND FEISCO, APPELLEES
661 So. 2d 122
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We affirm and certify the same question as certified in Barry v. Bur-dines and The Travelers, No. 94-2067, — So. 2d-[1995 WL 496997] (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 23, 1995):'
WHETHER SECTION 440.15(3)(B)4.D, FLORIDA STATUTES (1991), IS SUBJECT TO AND COMPORTS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE I OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT?
ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996)…SHAW, Justice. We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified: Whether section [440.15(3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act? We have jurisdiction. Art.…
-
Moriello v. State, 664 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Reversed. See Royster v. State, 657 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Campbell v. State, 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.…
-
Cramer v. State, 117 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 1997)…to the First District Court of Appeal; and that that court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida the same issue Cramer now raises: Whether the Florida law’s use of impairment ratings violates Title I of the ADA. Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.1995). We also know that the supreme court answered the question in the negative, holding that the Florida law’s use of impairment ratings to determine benefits does not violate the ADA. Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 6…