RONALD LEE ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONALD LEE ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
661 So. 2d 122
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Ronald Lee Robinson’s conviction for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. The state concedes that the trial court erred by assessing $200 in court costs because the offense is a misdemeanor for which a maximum of $50 in court costs may be imposed. § 27.3455(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). We remand to the trial court for correction of the judgment with respect to the assessment of court costs.
BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996)…SHAW, Justice. We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified: Whether section [440.15(3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act? We have jurisdiction. Art.…
-
Moriello v. State, 664 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Reversed. See Royster v. State, 657 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Campbell v. State, 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.…
-
Cramer v. State, 117 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 1997)…to the First District Court of Appeal; and that that court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida the same issue Cramer now raises: Whether the Florida law’s use of impairment ratings violates Title I of the ADA. Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.1995). We also know that the supreme court answered the question in the negative, holding that the Florida law’s use of impairment ratings to determine benefits does not violate the ADA. Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply, 6…