ABE SIMON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
D. A. FINLAYSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ABE SIMON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
D. A. FINLAYSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
79 Fla. 254
Florida Supreme Court (1920)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.-
This, cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon thé transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record' having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged' by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337 (Fla. 1925)…e, 85 Fla. 348, 96 South. Rep. 381. Nor was there error in the ruling denying defendant’s motion for a verdict of acquittal. A defendant is not entitled as of right to an instruction to the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. Simon v. Pinlayson, 79 Fla. 254, 84 South. Rep. 95; Drayton v, State, 78 Fla. 254, 82 South. Rep. 801; Hughes v. State, 61 Fla. 32, 55 South. Rep. 463. The defendant, at the time of the attempted arrest of the accused, was an officer of the town of Silver Bluff. The charge was a…