ANTHONY WOODSIDE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-10-18
No. 94-2637
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.
661 So. 2d 140 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to thirty years imprisonment for “resisting an officer with violence” because that offense is a third degree felony with a habitual offender statutory maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment.

Accordingly, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing consistent with the applicable statutory provisions. See Golden v. State, 603 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw