GILBERTO ALFONSO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attempted Felony Murder cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant’s motion for rehearing is granted, this court’s opinion filed April 12, 1995, is vacated; the judgment of conviction and sentence entered below after a jury trial for attempted first-degree felony murder, as charged in count two of the information, is hereby reversed; and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant from the cause as to this conviction and sentence only.
We reach this result based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of State v. Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1995) (ease, no. 83,766; opinion filed May 4,1995) [20 Fla. Law Weekly S204] (overruling Amlotte v. State, 456 So. 2d 448 (Fla.1984)), which held that there is no such crime in Florida as attempted first-degree felony murder. Specifically, we reject the state’s contention that the subject conviction for attempted first-degree felony murder should be reduced to a lesser offense; we are unaware of any authority in Florida, and have been cited to none, which would authorize a trial or appellate court to reduce a conviction for a nonexistent crime, as here, to a lesser offense.
As to the balance of the judgments of conviction and sentences under review, we affirm such judgments and sentences in all respects as they have not been challenged on appeal by the defendant.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION
The State moves for rehearing or certification, arguing that on remand there should either be a new trial on lesser included offenses or that the defendant’s conviction for attempted first degree felony murder should be reduced to a lesser included offense. We cannot agree. We interpret the Florida Su-' preme Court’s decision in State v. Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1995), to require an outright reversal, rather than a reduction to a lesser included offense or a new trial on lesser included offenses. Moreover, we see no principled basis for such reduction or new trial because, as a matter of law, there can be no lesser included offenses under a non-existent offense such as attempted first-degree felony murder. We recognize, however, that this issue will arise in most, if not all, cases governed by State v. Gray. Accordingly we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHEN A CONVICTION FOR ATTEMPTED FIRST DEGREE FELONY MURDER MUST BE VACATED ON AUTHORITY OF STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2D 552 (Fla.1995), DO LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES REMAIN VIABLE FOR A NEW TRIAL OR REDUCTION OF THE OFFENSE?
The motion for rehearing is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Thompson v. State, 667 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…tated murder. We note that in reversing and remanding for a new trial on the charge of attempted premeditated murder, this case differs from the recent cases of Lee v. State, 664 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified); Alfonso v. State, 661 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified), and Wilson v. State, 660 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified). In those cases this court refused to reduce a conviction for attempted felony murder to a lesser included offense or remand for a…
-
Pratt v. State, 668 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…te may have after the reversal of a conviction for a nonexistent crime. We foresee that uncertainty in this area of the law is likely to persist until the Florida Supreme Court makes a definitive ruling on this question. See, e.g., Alfonso v. State, 661 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (on mot. for reh’g & eertif.) (reversing conviction for attempted first-degree felony murder); Wilson, supra, 660 So. 2d at 1068, 1069 (on mot. for reh’g & eertif.). In the interest of seeking a declaration as to what further proc…
-
Gibson v. State, 667 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…motion for rehearing), rev. den., 663 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1995). As to the matter of attempted first-degree felony murder and the available options, if any, upon remand, we certify the same question of great public importance raised in Alfonso v. State, 661 So. 2d 308, 309 (Fla. 3d DCA) (on motion for rehearing and certification), came dism., 665 So. 2d 220 (Fla.1995). In affirming the convictions in Count I and Counts IV through VIII, we have concluded that the trial court did not err when it overruled the def…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Collin Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1995)
- Amlotte v. State, 456 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1984)