BRUCE BERTMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
ZFOUR, INC., APPELLEE
BRUCE BERTMAN, APPELLANT,
ZFOUR, INC., APPELLEE
661 So. 2d 423
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying defendant Bertman’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint on jurisdictional grounds. This af-firmance is without prejudice to defendant Bertman’s renewing his motion to dismiss should discovery yield evidence sufficient to establish lack of personal jurisdiction over him. See Venetian Salami Co: v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1989); Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hannon v. Nassr, 701 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…tate Department of Environmental Protection v. Crest Products, Inc., 671 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)(the filing of a notice for trial bars the trial court from dismissing the action for lack of prosecution); Oak Casualty Insurance Company v. Home, 661 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Reversed. . Ordinarily, the filing of a Motion to Dismiss is the event which marks the end of the one year period within which we look for record activity. In this case the order of dismissal was entered by the trial court,…
Authorities Cited
- Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989)
- Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Channdra Scott, 545 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Venancio NOA v. State, 545 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)