WILLIE OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief was affirmed except for the issue of the factual basis for the plea, which requires further proceedings.
Willie Owens pleaded no contest to second degree murder with a firearm and shooting into an occupied vehicle. He sought post-conviction relief, claimi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rules Of Criminal Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Willie Owens appeals the denial of his motion for post conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Owens raises three issues on appeal, only one of which requires further consideration. He entered a plea of no contest to second degree murder with a firearm and shooting into an occupied vehicle. He now claims that the factual basis presented to the trial court was inadequate to support the convictions.
The trial court that summarily denied the 3.850 motion prepared a four page order in which references are made to documents supporting the denial. Unfortunately there are no attachments to the order, and the record on appeal does not contain the documents.
The order of denial is affirmed except as to the issue of the absence of a factual basis for the plea. We vacate the denial as to that issue and remand for attachment of the missing items or a hearing if the documents fail to refute Owens’ claim. Ferrell v. State, 644 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Abdullah Shabazz v. State, 674 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…(2), Florida Statutes (1993), it was error for the guidelines scoresheet to include an additional eighteen points for possession of a firearm. See § 921.0014, Fla. Stat. (1993); Dacosta v. State, 672 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Shepherd v. State, 661 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This error results in a difference in the permissive sentencing range. Although appellant’s twelve-year sentence falls within the permissive range of a properly calculated scoresheet, we are unable to conclude that appellant’s…
-
Dacosta v. State, 672 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…PER CURIAM. The convictions below are affirmed. See State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla.1989). As in Shepherd v. State, 661 So. 2d 426, 426-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), however: Because the sentence included the three-year minimum mandatory provision required by section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1993), it was error, as the state concedes, for the guidelines scoresheet to include an…
Authorities Cited
- Rahming v. State, 644 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Ferrell v. State, 644 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)