JOSE DAVID PORTELA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Melara v. Cicione, 712 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …ection); Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (defendants claimed error of trial court’s restriction of voir dire inquiry not preserved where he failed to renew objection prior to the swearing of the [*431] jury); Portela v. State, 661 So. 2d 932, 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (defendant’s objection that his peremptory challenge was improperly overruled was not properly preserved where it was not renewed prior to jury being sworn). Since an improper reference to insurance matters in civil proceedin…
• Maultsby v. State, 688 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …served for appellate review where Maultsby accepted the panel by failing to renew his objection prior to the jury being sworn. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759, 765 (Fla.1996); Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174, 176 (Fla.1993); Portela v. State, 661 So. 2d 932, 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Cruz v. State, 660 So. 2d 792, 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. denied, 667 So. 2d 774 (Fla.1996). Affirmed. . State v. Slappy, 522 So. 2d 18 (Fla.), cert, denied, 487 U.S. 1219, 108 S.Ct. 2873, 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988).…
• Erick van Loan v. Heather Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., 216 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …sonable. This is especially true here because the amended restrictive covenants run with the land and the ambiguity in the declaration of amended restrictive covenants places a cloud on the titles of the Homeowners’ lots. See Caulk v. Orange County, 661 So. 2d 932, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (defining a covenant running with the land as one which binds the heirs and assigns of a covenantor). The Homeowners also alleged that they purchased their lots prior to the creation of the HHPOA and thus were only subject…

Authorities Cited

• Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1993)
• Cruz v. State, 660 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)