EDWARD C. VINING, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

EVA MARTYN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Everett Painting Co., Inc. v. Padula & Wadsworth Constr., Inc., 856 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …255.05 similar to those in section 713.245. The purpose of section 255.05 is to protect subcontractors and suppliers by providing them with an alternative remedy to mechanic’s liens on public projects. See Palm Beach County v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 661 So. 2d 942, 944 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Everett Painting’s second claim is for unpaid change orders in the amount of $3,916.00. Contractor argues that it is entitled to prevail on this claim as a matter of law due to a provision in the contract which states that…
• The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. MR. Elec. & Assocs., Inc., 949 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Palm Beach County v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 661 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). GUNTHER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
• Aquatic Plant Mgmt., Inc. v. Paramount Eng'g, Inc., 977 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …y payment bond statute is to provide subcontractors and suppliers on public projects with the same type of protection available to them on [*604] private construction projects under the mechanics’ lien law. Palm Beach County v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 661 So. 2d 942, 944 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Miller v. Knob Constr. Co., 368 So. 2d 891, 892-93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The statute is also considered “ ‘remedial in nature and therefore, entitled to a liberal construction’ ” to fulfill its intended purpose. Runyon Enters…