JOSE JAIME OTERO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-10-25
No. 95-221
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON, and GERSTEN, JJ.
661 So. 2d 959 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986); O’Connell v. State, 480 So. 2d 1284 (Fla.1985); Schummer v. State, 654 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. Bums, 651 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); State v. Zamora, 534 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. E.J.J., 682 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …olygraph examination, absent consent by both state and defendant, are inadmissible into evidence because they have not been shown to be reliable; the same rule applies even when the results appear to be favorable to the defendant); State v. Camacho, 661 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (trial court committed reversible error in dismissing information on the sole ground of defendant passing a polygraph test when such test and its results were not stipulated to by the state). Although not cited by the state in th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw