GREG PARRISH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Mizrahi v. Noemi Mizrahi, 867 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
  …raveling.” In essence, this lan [*1214] guage basically nullified the travel restriction contained in the May 9, 1991 order. This violates the father’s due process rights because it was entered without notice to the father. See Cummings v. Cummings, 662 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In addition, the May 9,1991 order restricting the children’s travel was not pled in the proceedings before Judge Rodriguez, and it was not tried by consent of the parties. We agree with the father that the minor children are not…
• Cummings v. Cummings, 37 So. 3d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …ving the marriage, the parties have made several visits to this court. In some of them, an attempt at review was ended before a brief was filed. No. 96-2879, 96-3708, 96-3946, 96-4073, and 01-2852. We issued written opinions in Cummings v. Cummings, 662 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Cummings v. Cummings, 685 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Cummings v. Cummings, 706 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Cummings v. Cummings, 719 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Cummings v. Cummings, 723 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998…
• Grove v. Grove, 141 So. 3d 677 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
  …d his due process rights. See Mizrahi v. Mizrahi, 867 So. 2d 1211, 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (stating that modification of a travel restriction regarding the children without notice to the father violated his due process rights); Cummings v. Cummings, 662 So. 2d 769, 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that modification of travel restriction without notice to the wife violated her due process rights). Therefore, we reverse the Amended Order as to Paragraph H and remand for the trial court to strike that paragraph…

Authorities Cited

• Lynch v. State, 659 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
• Caldwell v. State, 659 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)