ELIZABETH B. MCDONNELL, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL J. MCDONNELL, APPELLEE
ELIZABETH B. MCDONNELL, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL J. MCDONNELL, APPELLEE
662 So. 2d 1382
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. It was error to modify the parties’ property rights after a final adjudication of those rights had been made in a judgment of dissolution, where no grounds for modification were alleged or proved. Work v. Provine, 632 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Mills v. Mills, 339 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
WOLF, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
M.L.F. v. State, 678 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ible basis for “continued detention” might be. Finding no legal basis for the order directing that appellant be held in secure detention pending transfer to a moderate-risk residential facility, that order is reversed. See generally C.M.T. v. Soud, 662 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (granting writ of habeas corpus when juvenile was shown to have been ordered held in secure detention, contrary to RAI score, pending placement in moderate-risk residential program). We do not order appellant’s immediate release…
-
S.W. v. Woolsey, 673 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ment, rescored based on newly discovered evidence or changed circumstances with the results recommending detention[,] is introduced into evidence.” In support of his argument, counsel cited R.W. v. Soud, 639 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1994), and C.M.T. v. Soud, 662 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). According to petitioner’s counsel, the fact that petitioner had been found to have committed the delinquent act with which she had been charged was “not a change in circumstances” because the RAI had already reflected a score of…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Mills v. Mills, 339 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Work v. Provine, 632 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)