SEAGATE BEACH QUARTERS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SAVINGS BANK, AND HUDSON HOTELS CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-10-25
No. 94-2537
STONE, J., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.
663 So. 2d 3 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.

FARMER, Judge.

Because we find that triable issues remain with respect to Seagate Beach Quarters, Inc.’s claim for tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of Hudson Hotels Corporation. However, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of Rochester Community Savings Bank.

STONE, J., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hudson Hotels Corp. v. Seagate Beach Quarters, Inc., 696 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …The trial court entered summary judgment for Hudson Hotels and Seagate appealed. This court reversed, holding that there were triable issues remaining on the tortious interference claim. Seagate Beach Quarters, Inc. v. Rochester Community Sav. Bank, 663 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). On remand, Seagate moved to amend its complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages, arguing that the “intentional tort of interference with an advantageous business relationship, in and of itself, gives rise to a right to p…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw