RAYMOND ADAMS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1995-11-22
No. 94-00376
DANAHY, A.C.J;, and PARKER, J., concur.
663 So. 2d 674 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
FULMER, Judge.

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, Raymond Adams, Jr., appeals his convictions for four counts of kidnapping. We affirm three of the convictions but reverse the conviction for the kidnapping of Lowell Johnson, Sr. As to that charge, the defendant was entitled to be discharged for violation of the speedy trial rule for the reasons explained in this court’s opinion in the appeal of Adams’ co-defendant, Adams v. State, 659 So. 2d 396 (Fla.2d DCA 1995). See also Critton v. State, 659 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

We reverse the defendant’s conviction on the charge of kidnapping Lowell Johnson, Sr., and remand with directions that the conviction be vacated and the defendant be discharged on this count. Because the defendant’s sentencing scoresheet must be recalculated, we also remand for resentencing on the remaining three convictions which are affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J;, and PARKER, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Paulino, 696 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …ed to show that they are to run concurrently. His point is well taken. The trial court orally announced that the sentences were to be served concurrently, but did not indicate that on the written judgment. We remand for correction. Sanders v. State, 663 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). In doing so, we also note that Paulino’s convictions seem to arise from the same criminal episode, and for that reason it would be improper for the court to impose consecutive minimum mandatory terms under section 775.087. Gloste…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw