MICHAEL DAY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL DAY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
664 So. 2d 74
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Farber v. State, 409 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hansen v. State, 816 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…otion. See Ford v. State, 752 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Carvalleria v. State, 675 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). A motion to dismiss is timely where it is filed before the trial court has ruled on the rale 3.850 motion. See Gonzalez v. State, 664 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Howard v. State, 743 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In the present case, Appellant’s motion to dismiss was filed pursuant to the mailbox rale on August 14, 2001, and the trial court clerk’s office received the motion on August…
Authorities Cited
- Farber v. State, 409 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)