F.L.B., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
F.L.B., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
664 So. 2d 329
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The adjudication of delinquency for burglary of a dwelling is affirmed. The adjudication of delinquency for petit theft is vacated and we remand with directions to discharge the appellant as to the charge.
WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., concurring and dissenting with opinion.
Concurrence
BENTON, Judge,
concurring and dissenting.
I would affirm the burglary adjudication, reverse the petit theft adjudication, and remand for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…part standard (substantial and material change in circumstances that promotes child’s best interests) announced in Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). See Harp v. Null, 658 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). See also Good v. Good, 664 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The detriment-to-the-child standard obviously conflicts with Florida’s shared parenting law, which extends to both parents the same rights, interests, and control in the upbringing of their minor children. Moreover, it appears t…1 / 2
-
Lane v. Lane, 16 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…udgment based on the parties’ agreement. See, e.g., Adorno v. Rivera, 847 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Agranoff v. Agranoff, 882 So. 2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Jannotta v. Hess, 959 So. 2d 373, 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Good v. Good, 664 So. 2d 329, 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The trial court was right to be concerned with the last factor and its implications. Depending on the evidence, such conduct, if improper, could warrant a change. The only evidence in the record concerning Donna’s conduct,…