THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
EUSTACE LESLIE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reviewed a complaint against Eustace Leslie for the unlicensed practice of law. The court adopted the referee's findings that Leslie falsely represented himself as a licensed attorney and engaged in other deceptive practices. Consequently, Leslie was permanently enjoined from practicing law in Florida.
Yes, Eustace Leslie engaged in the unlicensed practice of law. The court adopted the referee's findings that Leslie's actions, including misrepresentation and operating as an attorney without a license, constituted the unauthorized practice of law.
[1] Engaging in the unauthorized practice of law includes falsely representing oneself as licensed to practice law in the state.
[2] Operating a "law office" within a law library, meeting clients there, and making/receiving client calls from that location constitutes the unauthorized practice of law.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The referee recommended that Leslie be enjoined by permanent injunction from engaging in the practice of law.”
This quote describes the referee's recommendation to the Supreme Court.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEustace Leslie was accused by The Florida Bar of engaging in the unlicensed practice of law. The referee found that Leslie falsely claimed to be a lic…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unlicensed Practice Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee’s uncontested report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Florida Bar filed a complaint alleging that Eustace Leslie engaged in the unlicensed practice of law. An order to show cause was served on Leslie and he filed an answer denying the allegations. A referee was appointed pursuant to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 10 — 7.1(e)(5).
After an evidentiary hearing, the referee concluded that Leslie engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by falsely representing himself to clients and other persons as licensed to practice law in Florida; by operating a “law office” within the Duval County Law Library; by meeting with clients at, receiving calls from clients, and making calls to clients from that library; by falsely misrepresenting on a state employment application that he was an attorney; and by using and distributing a business card falsely identifying himself as an attorney. The referee recommended that Leslie be enjoined by permanent injunction from engaging in the practice of law.
We conclude that the referee’s findings are based on competent substantial evidence and adopt the referee’s recommendation.
Accordingly, we permanently enjoin and restrain Eustace Leslie from engaging in the acts complained of and from otherwise engaging in the practice of law in this state. In the event Leslie engages in any activity constituting the practice of law in Florida he will be found in indirect criminal contempt of the Supreme Court of Florida and appropriate sanctions will be imposed. The Bar, as the prevailing party, is entitled to the taxation of costs in its favor. The Bar has submitted an affidavit setting forth costs in the amount of $1,089.13 which we find reasonable. Judgment for costs in the amount of $1,089.13 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Thomasina H. Williams, 734 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1999)…e.g., Florida Bar v. Lechtner, 666 So. 2d 892, 894 (Fla.1996) (“[Generally, when there is a finding that an attorney has been found guilty of violating a Rule Regulating the Florida Bar, the Bar should be awarded its costs.”); Florida Bar v. Leslie, 664 So. 2d 961, 962 (Fla.1995) (“The Bar, as the prevailing party, is entitled to the taxation of costs in its favor.”); Florida Bar v. Doe, 550 So. 2d 1111, 1111 (Fla.1989) (“We find that [the respondent] was guilty of minor misconduct because of an ethical viola…