STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MERCEDES ACOSTA, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
MERCEDES ACOSTA, APPELLEE
664 So. 2d 967
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court dismissed this case after concluding that a statutory provision under which defendant was charged was facially unconstitutional. In a companion case, State v. Marcolini, 664 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) we determined that the same provision was facially constitutional. We therefore reverse this case for the reasons expressed in Marcolini.
HERSEY, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marcolini v. State, 673 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1996)…WELLS, Justice. We have for review State v. Marcolini, 664 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and State v. Acosta, 664 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), based on apparent conflict with MacMillan v. State, 358 So. 2d 547 (Fla.1978). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Marcolini was charged with theft of electricity in violation of section 812.14, Florida Statute…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- State v. Marcolini, 664 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)