WILLIAMSBURG VACATIONS, INC., AND ROBERT T. GOW, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT E. LEE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Williamsburg Vacations and Robert Gow appealed from an order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court reversed, finding that the defendant's uncontroverted affidavits established no basis for Florida jurisdiction under the longarm statute or constitutional minimum contacts.
The court reversed and remanded, holding that defendants' uncontroverted affidavits established no basis for application of the Florida longarm statute or constitutional minimum contacts, and that the plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving jurisdictional basis by affidavit when faced with affidavits contesting the complaint's allegations.
[1] A plaintiff must prove by affidavit the jurisdictional basis for initiating an action in Florida when faced with affidavits contesting allegations of jurisdiction or mini…
[2] Bare allegations in a complaint are insufficient to establish jurisdiction or minimum contacts when uncontroverted by evidence.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A plaintiff, faced with affidavits contesting the allegations of the complaint regarding jurisdiction or minimum contacts, must prove by affidavit the jurisdictional basis for initiating the action in Florida.”
Establishes the burden of proof on the plaintiff when defendants submit affidavits challenging jurisdiction.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRobert E. Lee sued Williamsburg Vacations and Robert Gow regarding a time share project (Powhatan Project) located in Virginia. Lee claimed he partici…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Burden Of Proof For Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Judge.
Williamsburg Vacations, Inc. and Robert T. Gow have appealed from an order denying their motion to dismiss based upon lack of in personam jurisdiction. The uncontroverted evidence established that no basis existed for application of the Florida longarm statute. We reverse.
Robert E. Lee sued Williamsburg and Gow, alleging that he had been involved in the planning, development, marketing, managing, and financing of a time share project located in Virginia known as the Powhatan Project. He contended that Williamsburg had discontinued payments to him under a contract in 1991 and that he had been fraudulently misled as to the amount of money due him. In his complaint Lee sought declaratory relief and damages for Williamsburg’s and Cow’s alleged breach of contract, for tortious interference with contractual and business relations, and for civil conspiracy.
The sole jurisdictional allegations in the complaint were that Williamsburg and Gow do business in the state of Florida. Against these allegations Williamsburg and Gow filed affidavits stating that Williamsburg is a Virginia corporation with offices in Williamsburg and Norfolk only. The corporation is not licensed to do business in Florida nor has it ever engaged in business in Florida. The company has no employees or representatives in Florida. The discussions concerning the Powhatan project occurred primarily in Virginia. The parties did not anticipate that any of the activities that Lee would perform, such as financing, tax planning, or review of legal documents, would be performed in Florida. Lee filed no affidavits and offered no other evidence to controvert these facts. Thus, the bare allegations of the complaint are insufficient to show that either the requirements of the Florida longarm statute or of constitutional minimum contacts have been met.
A plaintiff, faced with affidavits contesting the allegations of the complaint regarding jurisdiction or minimum contacts, must prove by affidavit the jurisdictional basis for initiating the action in Florida. Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1989); Lampe v. Hoyne, 652 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Lee has not met this burden; the facts submitted in the sworn affidavits must be taken as true; and the complaint should have been dismissed.
Reverse and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cap. ONE Fin. Corp. v. Miller, 709 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…he jurisdictional allegations.” See Lampe v. Hoyne, 652 So. 2d 424, 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Otherwise, the facts submitted in the sworn affidavits must be taken as true; and the complaint should be dismissed. See Williamsburg Vacations, Inc. v. Lee, 664 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The appellant’s affidavit was adequate. The appellee filed no opposing affidavit and his complaint is unsworn. Therefore, the trial court erred in denying the motion of the appellant to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.…
Authorities Cited
- Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989)
- Lampe v. Hoyne, 652 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)