STEVEN DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
664 So. 2d 1099
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995)
Caution
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Steven Douglas appeals the trial court’s order imposing restitution. We affirm the portion of the order setting forth the amount of restitution. However, we reverse the portion of the order delegating to the probation officer the determination of the restitution payment schedule and remand for the trial court to establish the payment schedule and to enter the appropriate order. See Guinn v. State, 652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for entry of a new order establishing the payment schedule for the restitution.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.S. v. State, 717 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…V., 689 So. 2d at 421. In so ruling, we followed a line of authority which predated the enactment of section 924.051,2 and which arose when section 39.069 controlled appeals in delinquency cases. As the fifth district observed in Mitchell v. State, 664 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), restitution issues are different from those types of sentencing errors for which no timely objection was required prior to the enactment of section 924.051. See, e.g., State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013, 1016 (Fla.1984). Many sent…
-
Noland v. State, 734 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…igerator and grill were discovered missing in connection with the theft which occurred on April 28, 1998. As to the first point, the state points out that the contemporaneous objection rule applies to a restitution proceeding. See Mitchell v. State, 664 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accord J.S. v. State, 717 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). In order to preserve the right to appeal the inclusion of an item of restitution, a contemporaneous objection must ordinarily be made. Mitchell. The state asserts that ha…
-
Pearce v. State, 968 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…estitution payment schedule. Florida courts have long held that the determination of a restitution payment schedule is a judicial responsibility that cannot be delegated. Lewellen v. State, 685 So. 2d 1367, 1368 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Douglas v. State, 664 So. 2d 1099, 1099 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Guinn v. State, 652 So. 2d 902, 902 [*94] (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Briggs v. State, 647 So. 2d 182, 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); see also Thomas v. State, 635 So. 2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (finding error where the trial cour…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Guinn v. State, 652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)